[tc] [OT]Re: Ma risulta anche a voi questa "simpatica" caratteristica di Vista ?

167 167_ a libero.it
Ven 6 Apr 2007 10:45:07 CEST


Alessandro Crotti wrote:
> On 4/5/07, 167 <167_ a libero.it> wrote:
>   
>> 167 wrote:
>>     
>>> Alessandro Crotti wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Uno pensa sempre che abbiano toccato il fondo, e invece....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTMxOCw0LCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==
>>>>
>>>> pagina 4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vista, by default, writes CDs and DVDs to a "live file" format which
>>>> only works in Windows Vista and (Microsoft claims) Windows XP - not on
>>>> Macs, Linux, or Windows 2000 and earlier PCs. There is another option,
>>>> however, to master as a universal CD/DVD. I couldn't figure out how to
>>>> make it the default selection - it must be selected every time.
>>>> Furthermore, if you just simply drag and drop the files to the DVD,
>>>> it'll assume you want the "live file" format and start burning
>>>> immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> fantastico .. i *geni* del vendor lock-in ...
>>> semplice , efficace e inalterabile .
>>> che dire ..
>>> "where do you  want to go today?  with vista ,of course ... "
>>> _
>>>       
>> e ho trovato pure la doc tecnica ...
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/928353/it
>>
>>     
>
> Grazie delle informazioni, la cosa assume un aspetto un pochino meno
> preoccupante...
>
>   
da un punto di vista etico/legale , sicuramente . da un punto di vista 
pratico , l'UDF ha N revisioni e 3 varianti , e vista supporta
Windows Vista <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista> (Read+write) 
1.02, 1.50, 2.0x, 2.50, (Read) 2.60

mentre ,per gli altri OS

    * Linux 2.6.X (Read+write) 1.02, 1.50, 2.0x (write supported on HDD,
      DVD-RAM, DVD+RW and CD-RW from 2.6.10 onward, earlier versions
      support less media), 2.50 (read, via patch
      <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1671912&group_id=295&atid=300295>)
      NOTE: since 2.6.8, it is no longer possible to write files bigger
      than 1 GB [1]
      <http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=00a2b0f6dd2372842df73de72d51621b539fea44>
    * Mac OS 9 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_9> (Read+write)
      1.02, 1.50
    * Mac OS X <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X> 10.4 (Read+write)
      1.02, 1.50


"Even if a computer claims to be able to read UDF 1.50, it still may 
only support the /plain/ flavor but not the /VAT/ or /Spared/ flavors.

An example is Mac OS X (10.4.5), which claims to support UDF 1.50 (see 
/man mount_udf/), yet it can only mount disks of the /plain/ flavor 
properly (it cannot mount UDF disks with a VAT at all, see Sony Mavica 
problem <http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=75503>, and 
while it appears to be able to mount CD-RWs written with a Sparing 
Table, it does not read its files correctly in the case that files are 
actually remapped). Comparably Windows Vista is currently unable to read 
UDF DVDs on external DVD drives connected through USB 2.0."

quindi alla fine sarei curioso di sapere qual e' la revisione supportata 
di default da vista , anche perche ' ...

    * Windows 98 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_98>/Me
      <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Me> (Read) 1.02
    * Windows 2000 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_2000> (Read)
      1.02, 1.50
    * Windows XP <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP>/2003
      <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Server_2003> (Read) 1.02,
      1.50, 2.0x
    * Windows Vista <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista>
      (Read+write) 1.02, 1.50, 2.0x, 2.50, (Read) 2.60


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Disk_Format

insomma ,prevedo casini ...



Maggiori informazioni sulla lista tc